Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Industry Models topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Industry and college models spotlighted at House hearing: Caliber’s TAP, REACH degree apprenticeships, and IEC group sponsorship
Summary
Witnesses showcased operational apprenticeship models: Caliber Collision’s TAP for collision technicians, REACH University’s apprenticeship‑degree model for working adults, and the Independent Electrical Contractors’ group sponsorship approach enabling small contractors to participate and support apprentices with wraparound services.
Get email alerts on the Industry Models topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a House subcommittee hearing on apprenticeship modernization, witnesses gave granular descriptions of operational models that members said could be scaled to meet industry shortages.
Jamie Angel, senior director of apprenticeships and transitional programs at Caliber Collision, described TAP, the company’s registered apprenticeship for technicians. Angel said TAP has served nearly 1,000 apprentices in Texas and that Caliber apprentices are paid from day one, receive benefits and graduate debt free. She cited a Texas study with claims about substantial lifetime earnings gains from completion of the program and urged policy that gives program sponsors flexibility and financial incentives to expand.
Joe Ross, president of REACH University, discussed the apprenticeship‑degree model in which on‑the‑job learning is paired with evening or weekend seminars and workplace mentors. Ross said REACH caps learner out‑of‑pocket costs at $75 per month and that the model produces higher completion and placement rates than traditional pathways. He said the National Center for the Apprenticeship Degree helps other institutions replicate the approach.
Natasha Sherwood, workforce development director at the Independent Electrical Contractors, explained IEC’s group sponsorship model, which bundles curriculum, compliance and instruction so small contractors can participate without constructing a full program. Sherwood highlighted tools that reduce barriers—AI tutoring, virtual reality simulations, translation into 200 languages and wraparound services such as transportation assistance and hand tools—to improve access and retention.
Speakers also discussed practical barriers to scaling these models: identifying and incentivizing mentors, resolving credential portability, and aligning accreditors and licensing bodies to allow credit for workplace learning. Ladd and other witnesses noted coordination challenges—for example, nursing programs require aligning clinical rotations, licensing boards and employers to build paid apprenticeship pathways that replace unpaid clinical training.
Members and witnesses pointed to group sponsorship and degree‑connected apprenticeships as promising tactics to increase capacity while preserving rigor, and urged pairing financial incentives with robust technical assistance and intermediary support.

