Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lonsdale council adopts body‑worn camera policy as federal funds cover purchase

Lonsdale City Council · March 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Lonsdale City Council unanimously approved a police body‑worn camera policy after a public hearing; officials said $180,000 in federal funding will cover equipment and initial costs, and the policy follows the League of Minnesota Cities model.

The Lonsdale City Council unanimously approved a Use of Body Worn Camera Policy for the police department at its March 12 meeting after a public hearing and staff review.

Police Chief Jason Schmitz said the city has been awarded federal funding to purchase cameras but must adopt a formal policy before procurement. Schmitz told the council the policy mirrors the League of Minnesota Cities model and was reviewed by the city attorney, who recommended no changes.

Resident Jeffrey Vanreese, during the public hearing, said he was surprised the department did not already have cameras and argued they protect both officers and people who are arrested. “I was surprised the department didn’t already have body cameras; they protect both officers and the public,” Vanreese said, and asked about long‑term maintenance costs.

City Administrator Joel Erickson responded that federal funding will cover the purchase and initial work, and he confirmed the total expense for the program was $180,000. Councilmembers praised staff work and thanked federal representatives for securing the funding. Councilmember Scott Pelava noted the effort stretches back several years and welcomed the policy’s adoption.

The council voted 4‑0 to approve the policy. The police department will proceed with procurement consistent with the adopted policy and applicable funding requirements. The council did not take further action at the meeting on specific vendors or a procurement timeline.