Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates seasonal odd/even overnight parking change; no motion made
Summary
A proposal to limit odd/even overnight parking enforcement to Nov. 1'Apr. 1 drew debate over enforcement complexity, street-sweeping, narrow-street exemptions and a roughly $12,000 estimated revenue impact; the item failed for lack of motion.
Get email alerts on the Parking Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Building and Grounds Committee discussed a proposal to modify city ordinance 7.04.6.D so odd/even overnight parking would be enforced only from Nov. 1 through April 1, but members did not move the item forward.
Alderman Van Trieste said residents in his district reported that the year-round rule leaves no curb space for single-family homes on some blocks and that a seasonal enforcement window would be more convenient. "It's actually people in my district," he said, explaining the referral.
City engineering staff told the committee a citywide review would be necessary if the ordinance were changed, because engineering, fire, police, Park & Rec and transit would need to evaluate street-width exemptions and signage. Staff reported a Police estimate of about a 10% decrease in citation revenue, roughly $12,000 based on the most recent calendar-year figures.
Several committee members expressed concern about the operational complexity and public confusion that could follow a seasonal change. One member noted street-sweeping route planning could be disrupted and the fire chief had expressed opposition. Others argued that recent permitting changes (seven-day permitting) might offset some revenue effects but said a comprehensive evaluation would be required before altering the ordinance.
Committee members asked procedural questions; staff said the appropriate path is Building & Grounds review, then O&L, then Common Council. Van Trieste said he had not yet consulted the city attorney. Without a motion, the item failed for lack of motion and no referral to O&L was made that night.
The committee did not adopt any changes; members asked staff to consider the broader operational implications if the item returns for further study.
