Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parking Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee debates seasonal odd/even overnight parking change; no motion made

Waukesha City Building and Grounds Committee · June 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A proposal to limit odd/even overnight parking enforcement to Nov. 1'Apr. 1 drew debate over enforcement complexity, street-sweeping, narrow-street exemptions and a roughly $12,000 estimated revenue impact; the item failed for lack of motion.

The Building and Grounds Committee discussed a proposal to modify city ordinance 7.04.6.D so odd/even overnight parking would be enforced only from Nov. 1 through April 1, but members did not move the item forward.

Alderman Van Trieste said residents in his district reported that the year-round rule leaves no curb space for single-family homes on some blocks and that a seasonal enforcement window would be more convenient. "It's actually people in my district," he said, explaining the referral.

City engineering staff told the committee a citywide review would be necessary if the ordinance were changed, because engineering, fire, police, Park & Rec and transit would need to evaluate street-width exemptions and signage. Staff reported a Police estimate of about a 10% decrease in citation revenue, roughly $12,000 based on the most recent calendar-year figures.

Several committee members expressed concern about the operational complexity and public confusion that could follow a seasonal change. One member noted street-sweeping route planning could be disrupted and the fire chief had expressed opposition. Others argued that recent permitting changes (seven-day permitting) might offset some revenue effects but said a comprehensive evaluation would be required before altering the ordinance.

Committee members asked procedural questions; staff said the appropriate path is Building & Grounds review, then O&L, then Common Council. Van Trieste said he had not yet consulted the city attorney. Without a motion, the item failed for lack of motion and no referral to O&L was made that night.

The committee did not adopt any changes; members asked staff to consider the broader operational implications if the item returns for further study.