Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission recommends rezoning for 265-unit apartment project on East State Highway 121 Business
Summary
The Louisville Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6–0 to recommend a zone change allowing a 265-unit, four-story multifamily development on about 7.082 acres at 1918 and 1926–1954 East State Highway 121 Business; the city council will hold the final hearing after the property owner submits an authorization letter.
The Louisville Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6–0 on Tuesday to recommend approval of an ordinance to rezone about 7.082 acres at 1918 and 1926–1954 East State Highway 121 Business from Light Industrial to Planned Development Multifamily 3, clearing the way for a proposed 265-unit, three–building, four-story apartment complex.
Jonathan, a city planning staff member who presented the case to the commission, said the proposal includes deviations from the base development standards — including greater density, increased building height, reduced setbacks and a reduced landscaping buffer area — but noted the applicant will plant the required trees. Jonathan also said the applicant is requesting a reduced parking ratio of 1.6 spaces per unit, and that "staff has found that the 1.6 parking ratio has been successful with other multifamily projects in the city of Louisville." The staff overview identified project amenities such as a pool, clubhouse and dog run.
The applicant's representative, Maxwell Fischer of ZonDev, described the proposal as a continuation of an adjacent redevelopment. "We continue to transform this corridor into an aesthetically pleasing residential oriented area," Fischer said, and outlined interior and exterior upgrades the developer expects to deliver, including furnished units, stainless-steel appliances and a resort-style pool. Fischer said the same design standards used in the earlier phase were being applied to this site and asked the commission to approve the deviations to support the higher-quality product.
A commissioner asked about environmental remediation of the former automotive salvage uses on the site. Fischer said the developer used the same environmental engineer as on the adjacent project and reported receiving a "no further action" recommendation; he also suggested the property owner could provide additional detail. No members of the public spoke during the public comment period.
A commissioner moved "to recommend approval of the zone change as presented." The motion was seconded and passed, recorded in the minutes as a 6–0 vote with one member absent. Jonathan told the commission the associated public hearing before the City Council will not be scheduled until the property owner submits an authorization letter allowing the applicant to proceed; staff urged interested parties to check the city's website and council agendas for the council hearing date.
Next steps: the commission's recommendation goes to the City Council for a final decision once the owner submits the required authorization letter. The commission adjourned after approving the recommendation.
