Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Street Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
New Richland council accepts feasibility report, sets improvement hearing for four‑block street project
Summary
The council accepted a preliminary engineering report for a two‑street, four‑block reconstruction (Ash Street and Broadway), ordered the Chapter 429 improvement hearing and adopted a revised special‑assessment policy to guide how costs may be apportioned to adjacent property owners.
Get email alerts on the Street Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The New Richland City Council on Oct. 14 accepted a feasibility (preliminary engineer) report and voted to order the required improvement hearing for a proposed 2025 street and utility reconstruction covering two blocks on Ash Street and two blocks on Broadway.
City staffer Cory, presenting the study, told the council the work is a bottom‑up reconstruction that would replace sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer, add underdrain, rebuild pavement and provide sidewalks on selected sides of the corridor. Cory said the corridor south of Highway 30 exhibited some of the system’s worst sanitary‑sewer conditions based on 2023 televising and that the four‑block scope targets the highest‑priority failures. He estimated the project budget at about $2.5 million for the four blocks and described a delivery timeline that includes a neighborhood open house, an improvement hearing and construction in 2025.
Council member Jody and several residents raised affordability concerns about the property‑owner share of costs. One resident who lives on the project edge said that, under a 30% assessment share, the total assessed across the frontage ‘‘would be about $40,000–$45,000 ap’’ given the number of properties in that segment. Cory and staff cautioned that the project addresses the most urgent segment and noted upstream and downstream problems remain; they said the assessment policy provides a framework but that the council retains discretion to address individual hardships.
The council also discussed how the school district’s frontage is treated under Chapter 429. Cory said special assessments under Chapter 429 apply to adjacent properties and that school districts have been assessed in prior projects; the school district’s long frontage means its assessed share could be sizable under the draft policy.
On a motion, the council adopted Resolution 24‑20 to receive the feasibility report and call the improvement hearing required by Chapter 429. Council separately debated and then adopted a revised special‑assessment policy (replacing a 2002 policy) to provide a modernized framework for calculating frontage shares, corner‑lot treatment and other assessment rules. Staff will prepare specific assessment roll figures and be prepared to present estimates at the scheduled neighborhood open house and the improvement hearing.
The council was explicit that the policy is guidance: officials said they can use it as a starting point but may adjust assessment amounts or make exceptions as part of the assessment hearing if warranted by equity concerns or special circumstances. Next procedural steps are a mailed notice, a neighborhood open house and the formal improvement hearing scheduled under the Chapter 429 process; if assessments are confirmed, the first payments for assessed property owners would typically begin in 2026.

