Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Atascosa court approves water-tank project; El Oso Water Supply to cover grant shortfall

Atascosa County Commissioners Court · June 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners approved awarding a TXCDBG water supply contract to MGB Construction for $598,065 to build a 150,000-gallon tank for El Oso Water Supply Corporation; the project is funded by a $390,000 grant with El Oso agreeing to pay the $208,065 difference.

The Atascosa County Commissioners Court on June 22 approved a recommendation from engineering consultant Cope Engineering to award a Texas CDBG contract (CDV23-0227) for improvements to the Peggy Water Supply Plant and El Oso Water Supply Corporation.

Gregory Barfell of Cope Engineering told the court that MGB Construction submitted the lowest responsive bid at $598,065 to build a 150,000-gallon bolted steel ground storage tank. The grant award from the state was $390,000; El Oso Water Supply Corporation’s board elected to pay the remaining $208,065 to move forward with the steel tank configuration. Cope recommended proceeding with the MGB Construction contract and the court approved the motion.

Court discussion confirmed that El Oso will cover the additional funds beyond the grant and that the county’s role is as the governing body for the grant agreement. Documents including the letter of recommendation and bid tabulation were provided to the court and retained with the meeting record. The contract award directs staff to execute the contract consistent with the grant and local procurement rules.

The approved action will allow the project to proceed subject to contract execution and routine engineering oversight; no county-funded portion beyond administrative oversight was recorded in the discussion, and El Oso committed to the difference in cost.

The court moved on to its next agenda items after voting to approve the bid award.