Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Regional Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

CCRPC discusses three-tier future land-use approach under S.100 and recommends extending ECOS schedule

Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission Executive Committee · June 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

CCRPC staff outlined a three-tier land-use framework tied to S.100/Act 47 and recommended a six- to nine-month extension of the ECOS Regional Plan schedule to allow map updates, housing-target integration, and community review of proposals.

CCRPC Executive Director Charlie Baker told the Executive Committee on Sept. 6 that staff are working on recommendations to the legislature to create more consistent regional future land-use categories and to provide an option for municipal delegation of Act 250. This work is part of studies required under S.100 (also referenced as Act 47).

Baker described a three-tier framework under discussion for the Act 250 NRB study: Tier 1 would encompass growth areas—centers, metro, suburban and villages with water and sewer—potentially exempt from Act 250; Tier 2 would cover rural and working lands and separate enterprise or ski-resort areas; and Tier 3 would identify State and local 'no-go' zones intended to protect critical natural resources.

Members discussed floodplain and flooding concerns and asked staff to consider how draft maps would treat flood-prone areas. Baker said three reasons justify a six- to nine-month extension of the ECOS Regional Plan schedule: (1) if S.100 passes, CCRPC will likely be asked to update maps quickly and will need more time; (2) the State is required to set regional housing targets and the next housing needs assessment is scheduled for completion by March 2024, which will trigger municipal requests for target data; and (3) staff want to provide marginalized communities the opportunity to review proposed changes.

No formal vote to change the ECOS schedule was recorded at the Executive Committee level; Charlie Baker said the recommendation and rationale would inform the Board and legislative coordination.