Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Landscaping topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Madeira Beach staff outlines landscaping overhaul; commissioners favor allowing shell and permeable turf with safeguards
Summary
Staff presented a draft rewrite of landscaping rules to reduce permit closeout delays and contradictions: proposals include allowing permeable artificial turf and permeable pavers to count for impervious surface ratio (with specs), clarifying intersection visibility, referencing UF plant lists for tree species, and options to allow shell to count toward residential landscape requirements; commissioners urged clear maintenance and right‑of‑way rules.
City planning staff presented a preliminary rewrite of the landscaping chapter to resolve inconsistent enforcement and speed permit closeouts. The current code requires 25% of single‑family lots to be living ground cover; staff asked whether the commission wished to keep that standard, allow permeable artificial turf to count when installed to standards, allow shell or stone to count under conditions, and tighten right‑of‑way plant restrictions to reduce maintenance conflicts for public works.
Key staff proposals included: crediting permeable pavers and permeable artificial turf toward impervious‑surface requirements when installed per technical specs; allowing them to count toward landscape requirements if they meet permeability standards; moving intersection‑visibility rules into the zoning chapter with a clarified triangle (25‑foot default, 15‑foot alley exception) and a recommended maximum shrub height in that triangle (staff discussion favored lowering 36 inches to roughly 30 inches for visibility); and referencing the University of Florida 'Florida‑Friendly' plant list and Pinellas County prohibited species lists to eliminate contradictory species lists in the code.
Commissioners and residents discussed limits on turf and shell in the public right‑of‑way, recommended recorded agreements or permit conditions that make property owners responsible for restoration after public works projects, and asked staff to preserve vegetative buffers while offering flexibility for residential aesthetics. Public works staff said turf in the right‑of‑way creates expensive restoration liabilities if installed or maintained incorrectly; staff suggested allowing right‑of‑way installations only with a documented written agreement that the owner accepts restoration responsibility.
Staff will refine draft language to allow shell/turf credit subject to permeability and maintenance standards, preserve vegetative buffer requirements for multi‑family and commercial properties, and return the document to planning commission review.
