Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council reviews Bolton water-study and authorizes follow-up on regional and groundwater options

Hoyt Lakes City Council · August 26, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Councilors heard a draft water-system analysis from Bolton, which presented six alternatives with capital estimates ranging roughly $13M–$33M. The council authorized follow-up: questions for the East Range Water Board and a hydrogeologic study to evaluate groundwater as an alternative source.

Hoyt Lakes city officials on Aug. 1 reviewed a draft water-system analysis prepared by Bolton and directed staff to pursue follow-up work on two alternatives: regionalization with the East Range Water Board and a hydrogeologic study to evaluate groundwater as a possible new source.

Jacob Chisco of Bolton summarized the report’s findings, saying the city’s source-water and treatment-plant age drive high operations-and-maintenance costs. He told councilors the study evaluated six alternatives — from restoring the existing treatment plant using the current lake source to building a new plant using groundwater — with capital estimates that ranged roughly between $13 million and $33 million depending on the option.

Chisco said Hoyt Lakes spends a large share of its budget treating lake source water and highlighted chemical and O&M cost differences: "your water production cost is roughly $3.9 per 1,000 gallons" and the city’s annual O&M range was presented at about $450,000–$530,000. He also noted the city’s chemical line-item of about $126,000 annually compared with an example community presented at $9,000.

Bolton’s technical-committee review narrowed the next steps to two priorities: prepare targeted questions to understand infrastructure ownership, representation and cost-sharing with the East Range Water Board, and commission a hydrogeologic (desktop and, if warranted, test-well) study to assess groundwater quantity and quality. Chisco said a desktop hydrogeologic study could take two to three months; full test-well programs would take longer.

Councilors discussed timing and the county’s road project that may require pipe-sizing decisions within months. After deliberation, the council moved and passed a motion to ask Bolton to begin the stated action items: draft questions for the water board, seek cost estimates for the interconnect option, and scope a hydrogeologic study to evaluate groundwater as an alternative.

Council materials include detailed cost-opinion tables and funding recommendations, including applying to the Drinking Water Revolving Fund for low-interest loans and reviewing affordability thresholds tied to state funding criteria.