Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parent tells Fairfield board a teacher assaulted her child and asks for investigation
Summary
Alicia Smith, who signed in for public comment, alleged a teacher physically assaulted her child on Nov. 18 and said the teacher was later reinstated; she urged the board to investigate and enforce policy 0167.3. The board did not record a referral or vote on the matter during the meeting.
Get email alerts on the Student Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Alicia Smith addressed the Fairfield School Board during public comment and said that on Nov. 18 a teacher assaulted her child, describing threats, physical restraint and other abusive conduct. "The teacher threatened to kick my child's ass, then wrapped his arm around his neck, tackled him to the ground," Smith said, and added the student later suffered ongoing anxiety, headaches and sleep loss.
Smith said the teacher had a history of abusive language and conduct toward students and that, despite these incidents, the teacher was allowed back in the classroom. "Where is children first in this decision? Where is the accountability?" she asked, urging the board to investigate how the teacher was reinstated, enforce district policy and take steps to repair the harm.
The board had read its public participation policy (Board Policy 0167.3) at the start of the meeting, which sets decorum and limits for speakers. When asked for a response after Smith’s remarks, Superintendent Dr. Cannon said, "Not to that," and the meeting proceeded to regular reports; the transcript contains no recorded motion to refer the allegation to staff, a personnel committee, or law enforcement.
Board policy cited during the meeting requires prompt action for threats or violent acts and directs reporting of criminal behavior to law enforcement. Smith asked the board to follow those policy directives and to explain why the teacher was reinstated.
The meeting record shows no vote, formal referral, or announced next step on Smith’s allegations. The board later moved on to reports, including a superintendent report about graduation rates and routine business (donations, grants and handbooks). The board may take personnel or investigatory steps outside the public meeting record; none were announced at this session.
What happens next: The transcript does not document any immediate investigatory action, referral or a timeline for review. The board did not announce a vote or a staff assignment related to Smith’s request during this meeting.

