Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Will Serve topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Avon WPCA requires developer‑paid impact study, approves will‑serve modification for Avon Gardens
Summary
The Avon Water Pollution Control Authority voted May 13 to require a developer-funded impact analysis for The Homes at Avon Park Phases III–IV and approved a will‑serve modification for the Avon Gardens/Avon Mills expansion by Gal Equities.
Get email alerts on the Will Serve topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Avon Water Pollution Control Authority on May 13 voted to require a developer‑funded impact analysis for The Homes at Avon Park, Phases III and IV, and approved a will‑serve modification for the Avon Gardens/Avon Mills expansion.
Town Engineer Lawrence Baril presented both requests and described the anticipated increased wastewater flows that prompted the additional review for Avon Park. On the Homes at Avon Park item, the Authority approved a motion — moved by Vice‑Chairperson Pam Monroe and seconded by Aden Baume — that the developer pay for another impact analysis to evaluate effects on the town’s collection system. Monroe, Chairperson Chris Roy and Baume voted in favor.
On the Avon Gardens/Avon Mills matter, Baril summarized Gal Equities’ plans and the Authority approved a will‑serve modification “in accordance with the current will‑serve policy.” That motion was moved by Monroe, seconded by Roy, and passed with Monroe, Roy and Baume voting in favor.
The votes follow the Authority’s practice of reviewing flows and collection‑system impacts before finalizing service commitments to new or expanded residential developments. Audience members listed in the meeting record included Emily Bouton‑Beacon, Ramana Hruby of SLR and Mendell Posner, who was noted as representing Avon Place/Avon Gardens. The meeting minutes do not specify additional technical details of the analyses to be performed or timelines for delivery.
The Authority did not adopt any changes to will‑serve policy language at the meeting; the approvals were limited to the two developer requests and the direction to obtain the additional analysis for the Avon Park proposal.
