Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Federal Tax Compliance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff counsel warns commission a 60‑year normal retirement age will require data to justify it under federal rules
Summary
Staff counsel told the commission Internal Revenue Code safe harbors favor retirement ages 62 and older; selecting age 60 will require the commission to document that the age is reasonably representative of the covered workforce or fit within a public‑safety safe harbor, so staff recommended collecting state and national retirement timing data.
Susan, staff counsel to the commission, briefed members on federal requirements for defining a plan’s normal retirement age. She explained Internal Revenue Code rules and safe harbors: choosing age 62 or older generally satisfies the safe harbor, but selecting an age under 62 requires proof that the chosen age is reasonably representative of the typical retirement age for the covered workforce.
"Normal retirement age is defined in the regulations as being an age that is not earlier than the earliest age that is reasonably representative of the typical retirement age for the industry in which the covered workforce has been employed," Susan said, and she advised the commission to gather state or national data to substantiate a 60‑year normal age if it pursues that option.
Susan also noted a public‑safety safe harbor in federal rules that permits earlier normal ages for qualified public safety employees (police, firefighters, corrections and certain forensic security employees) but cautioned that the commission’s candidate group must be substantially composed of those positions to rely on that safe harbor. On the technical tax limits affecting purchase of service credit and benefit caps, she said statutory limits under Code section 415 and related rules should not be a practical obstacle for the designs under discussion (the defined‑benefit annual benefit limit is high relative to the benefits under study).
What the commission will do: staff recommended collecting employer/plan data showing typical retirement ages and separation behavior for telecommunicators, probation officers and forensic roles so the commission can document compliance if it sets a 60‑year normal retirement age or relies on a public‑safety safe harbor.
No formal decisions were taken during the legal briefing; commissioners directed staff to obtain the cited data and consult with counsel if the commission proceeds with age 60 in statutory language.
