Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Midland ISD board adopts balanced 2026–27 budget, approves transfers to cover insurance and capital timing
Summary
After a public hearing, Midland ISD trustees approved the 2026–27 budget and a related final amendment for 2025–26, and authorized transfers including $3 million to the district’s self‑funded medical plan and moving up to $9.69 million (including timing items) to a local capital projects fund to address timing and planned obligations.
The Midland ISD Board of Trustees voted unanimously on June 23 to adopt the district’s 2026–27 budget for the general fund, child nutrition fund and debt service fund as presented by Chief Financial Officer Mr. Durham. Administration said the proposed budgets are balanced and that final tax‑rate work will follow after TEA issues the maximum compression rate in August.
Mr. Durham told trustees the district faces sizable recapture obligations driven by property‑value changes; his presentation included recapture estimates in the tens of millions and a working projection of certified values that will affect final tax‑rate calculations. The budget presentation highlighted three board priorities: adopt a balanced and sustainable budget, deliver compensation increases previously approved by the board, and use a data‑driven budget aligned to board goals.
At the same meeting the board also approved the 2025–26 final budget amendment. Durham said the amendment includes a precautionary increase in budgeted recapture amounts to ensure the district has sufficient funds categorized by function before auditors close the year; he stressed the revision is a compliance and cushion step and not an additional spending authorization.
Separately, trustees authorized transfers to address two near‑term fiscal priorities: a $3.0 million transfer from the general fund to the self‑funded medical plan to cover high‑cost claims in plan year 2025–26, and approval to commit up to $9.69 million from the general fund into a local capital projects fund (the motion included moving $3.69 million of already‑obligated timing items and authority to transfer up to $6.0 million more for future board‑approved capital needs). Administration emphasized that funds placed in the capital projects fund still require subsequent board approval before they are expended.
Board members pressed for clarity on audit and compliance implications. Durham explained that state auditors require sufficient budgeted amounts within functions (for example, for any recapture liability) to avoid audit findings; the final amendment is intended to avoid a technical finding if certified collections deviate slightly from projections.
Why it matters: Approval of a district budget is a formal legal step that sets spending authority for the next fiscal year and signals the board’s priorities on compensation, capital investment and risk management. The $3.0 million transfer to the medical plan is an immediate step to stabilize benefit reserves; the capital‑project transfer is largely an accounting/timing move to reserve funds for projects already authorized or anticipated.
What’s next: District staff will await TEA’s August compression rate to finalize the tax‑rate resolution and will bring any capital‑project spending requests back to the board for specific approval.
Vote and outcome: The motions to adopt the budget, approve the 2025–26 budget amendment, and commit the specified fund transfers passed unanimously among trustees present.
