Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Body Worn Cameras topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lake County approves seven Motorola body-worn cameras after public urges careful vendor selection
Summary
The Lake County Board approved purchase of seven Motorola V700 body-worn cameras via Sourcewell contract 101223-MOT and waived competitive bidding under county code 2-38.4 after public commenters urged the sheriff to consider evidence-management reliability and total lifecycle cost.
Get email alerts on the Body Worn Cameras topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Lake County Board of Supervisors approved the purchase of seven Motorola V700 body-worn cameras through Sourcewell contract 101223-MOT and found the purchase exempt from competitive bidding under Lake County Code section 2-38.4.
During discussion, members of the public raised concerns about whether the county was selecting the best evidence-management system and warned that lower-cost products have documented upload and synchronization problems. One caller identifying as Sky Lewal of Skywalks Bay Family Farms urged the board to evaluate systems such as Axon that some agencies use for integrated evidence management. "When the record fails to upload properly to the cloud . . . the public trust suffers," the caller said.
Sheriff Bingham responded that the department had long used WatchGuard products (which were later acquired by Motorola), and that the office recently migrated to a cloud-based evidence system. "At this point I . . . we have found no issues with the cloud-based system with the uploading or the retention of the video evidence," the sheriff said and noted the department was not aware of lost or corrupted uploads.
County counsel said the motion language was prepared and confirmed the purchase price in the contract; the transcript records the motion to approve the seven Motorola V700 cameras through the Sourcewell contract and to find the purchase exempt from competitive bidding. The board recorded a 4-0 vote in favor.
Public commenters urged the county to weigh ease of use, automated workflows and chain-of-custody features when choosing a vendor, noting that higher upfront costs can sometimes reduce downstream legal and operational risks. The board approved the contract and the bidding exemption and then concluded discussion on the item.

