Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning And Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff preview July planning and zoning items, including Shore Drive rezoning and state‑driven ordinance changes
Summary
City planning staff briefed council on numerous July agenda items: conditional rezonings and CUPs (including a 52‑unit Shore Drive proposal that drew letters of opposition), several short‑term rental CUPs concentrated in District 6, and zoning‑ordinance amendments required by 2026 state bills (solar, temporary wireless facilities, parking reductions, R2.5 standards, and nonconforming mobile‑home rules).
Caitlyn Alcott ran the City of Virginia Beach’s planning preview on June 22, walking council through items scheduled for the July 7 and July 14 meetings, including subdivision variances, modification‑of‑condition requests, conditional use permits and rezoning requests across multiple districts.
Alcott described individual cases scheduled for July 7: a subdivision variance at 1117 Beautiful Street (District 6) for a parcel created by deed in 1954; a modification to add gunsmithing to a home‑occupation permit at 1492 Backbay Landing Road (District 2) contingent on a federal firearms license; a request to allow three bedrooms in a short‑term rental that previously had a bedroom limit; and a proposed four‑level parking garage at Westminster‑Canterbury (3100 Shore Drive) that would replace a surface lot and include a front‑yard setback deviation and tree‑replacement conditions.
Zoning administrator Hannah Sabo summarized several ordinance updates required by 2026 state legislation: House Bill 711 requires localities to permit solar facilities in certain districts and the city’s amendment adds solar facilities as a principal use requiring a conditional use permit; House Bill 876 sets time‑limited rules for temporary wireless structures and small wireless facilities during events or emergencies; House Bill 888 creates a parking‑reduction option for residential uses within half a mile of transit; House Bill 1212 requires a district permitting single‑family dwellings on 30‑foot‑wide lots; and House Bill 1463 addresses nonconforming mobile homes. Staff said they will return with specific condition language where needed.
Alcott then reviewed July 14 items, including a city‑owned parcel rezoning request on Upton Drive (District 5) seeking preservation zoning, and a conditional rezoning/CUP for a 52‑unit condominium development at Shore Drive and Marlin Bay Drive (District 9). The Shore Drive proposal would add roughly 2,000–2,500 square feet of retail, include buildings from three to five stories, and request deviations to a 30‑foot Clipper Bay Drive setback and a limited stairwell height allowance up to 43 feet. The Bayfront Advisory Commission recommended conditions; planning staff reported two letters of support, three letters of concern and 57 letters of opposition and said the planning commission recommended approval by a 9‑1 vote with one abstention.
Several short‑term rental conditional use permit requests clustered in District 6 drew noted resident opposition; staff said most had no substantiated code violations and the planning commission recommended approval in each case (typical votes 10‑1). Alcott and council members discussed neighborhood impacts and the possibility of policy changes to how overlays are applied in the area.
No formal votes on the July items were taken during the briefing; staff indicated items would return for council action on the scheduled dates. Alcott and Sabo emphasized that many of the ordinance updates respond directly to recently enacted state law and that staff will follow up with draft conditions and maps as required.
