Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Applicant proposes 22‑truck parking yard on five‑acre site; board questions traffic and long‑term storage
Summary
An owner who said he operates a 22‑truck hauler told the board he wants to use a newly purchased 5‑acre lot for parking and trailer exchanges only; board members asked about site improvements, trailer storage, and traffic impacts.
Get email alerts on the Development Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A local trucking business owner told the North Valleys neighborhood advisory board on June 18 that he purchased a five‑acre lot and seeks permission to use it as a parking and trailer‑exchange yard for about 22 trucks. The applicant, Kep Gum, said he has worked in trucking for nearly 26 years and that the proposal is “just for parking the truck,” not to build a new terminal.
Board members pressed for operational details. “Are you planning on actually developing the whole area or just using the lot itself for parking your trucks?” asked a board member. Gum replied it will be used primarily for parking and cycling trailers: drivers will drop off a trailer, pick another up and continue their runs. He said that sometimes trailers will remain briefly but that the intent is not long‑term trailer storage.
Planning staff and board members asked whether the applicant intended to use the entire five acres and whether site work would be required. “Yes, for all 22 trucks,” Gum said when asked if the full site would be used. He also said his engineer was not present that evening and that specific development plans were not available.
Board members asked about traffic. One member asked whether the operation would cause “a lot of traffic.” Gum answered that much of the hauling is long‑distance (California, Utah, Colorado, the Midwest) and that the yard would primarily host truck drop‑and‑pick operations rather than frequent local trips.
No final decision or vote on the development was recorded in the meeting transcript. Staff asked the applicant to provide missing documentation (engineer details and site plans) by a stated deadline so the item can proceed through the formal review process.
Next steps: the applicant is expected to submit engineering and site‑use details to planning staff for routing and review; any formal zoning or land‑use action will be noticed separately.

