Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Building Improvements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Starmont board reviews KCL and Apex assessments, hears HVAC options without taking action
Summary
At a Sept. 29 work session the Starmont Community School District Board reviewed a KCL Engineering assessment and an Apex review and evaluated several HVAC system options for building improvements; the board did not vote on any capital work at the meeting.
The Starmont Community School District Board met in a work session on Sept. 29 and reviewed engineering assessments and heating, ventilation and air-conditioning options for planned building improvements. President Julie Uhlenkamp called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. in the Starmont High School conference room.
Board members examined a KCL Engineering Assessment and an Apex review and were presented with several HVAC system options intended to inform future capital decisions. Superintendent Robert Busch was listed as present for the discussion. The transcript records the presentations and a question-and-answer period but contains no motion or vote to approve specific work, contracts, or expenditures related to the assessments.
The meeting opened with a procedural vote: Doug Puffett moved to approve the agenda as presented, Tony Recker seconded, and the motion carried, 5-0. Later in the session, Puffett moved to adjourn at 7:52 p.m.; Jacob Moellers seconded, and that motion also carried, 5-0.
Why it matters: The engineering and vendor reviews cover the district’s buildings and potential HVAC upgrades that could affect maintenance budgets, classroom comfort and long-term capital planning. The board’s review at this work session appears to have been informational; the transcript does not show a directive to proceed to design, procurement, or bond/levy action.
What happened next: The work session concluded with the adjournment at 7:52 p.m.; the transcript does not record any formal decisions on the building improvements or a timetable for follow-up action.
Votes at a glance: The transcript records two procedural votes. 1) Approval of the agenda — motion by Doug Puffett, seconded by Tony Recker; outcome: carried, 5-0. 2) Adjournment at 7:52 p.m. — motion by Doug Puffett, seconded by Jacob Moellers; outcome: carried, 5-0.
