Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Brownsville council conditionally approves parcel split, asks for more data on proposed Adams Street building
Summary
Council introduced and conditionally approved a resolution to split parcel 20.0112.000 (finalization contingent on a Nov. 6 special public meeting) and asked for slope and dimension data before deciding on construction in a conservancy district on parcel 20.0036.000; the council also approved three building permits.
The Brownsville City Council on Oct. 2 conditionally approved a resolution to split parcel 20.0112.000 and approved three building permits after discussing conservancy-district restrictions that limit excavation and prohibit construction on slopes steeper than 15 degrees.
Mayor Jean Meyer introduced a resolution to divide parcel 20.0112.000 into two equal parcels separated by an east–west centerline. Council Member Tim Klug moved to proceed and Bill Fitzpatrick seconded; the motion passed with the caveat that the split will follow approval at a special public meeting scheduled for Nov. 6, 2024.
Separately, residents Mark Oldenburg, Carla Miller and Gary Boynton asked about constructing a shed or house on parcel 20.0036.000 along Adams Street. Meyer explained the property lies in a conservancy district with excavation restrictions and noted the city ordinance that limits building on slopes greater than 15 degrees. The mayor requested additional information on the site’s slope and proposed building dimensions for the November meeting before the council will act.
On building permits, the council approved three applications: Jeanne Farnham-Davy’s roof over an existing ramp/walkway; Chris Dvorak’s fence behind a residence; and Charles Schlegel’s plan to replace a shed with a 40‑foot shipping container plus a 40'×20' lean‑to. Pam Walhovd moved to approve the three permits, Tim Klug seconded, and the motion passed.
The council did not adopt any ordinance changes at this meeting; members agreed to review the proposed list of ordinance violations submitted by city maintenance at a future session.
