Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the It Contracts topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Kossuth County approves firewall license renewals and hardware replacements after vendor briefing

Kossuth County Board of Supervisors · June 23, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Supervisors approved approximately $24,867 in firewall/license renewals and roughly $20,654 in one‑time hardware and labor costs after a vendor explained the split between recurring co‑management fees and one‑time replacements.

Kossuth County supervisors on June 26 approved the renewal of firewall licenses and replacement of specified network hardware following a remote presentation from the county’s IT vendor.

The board’s action covered two distinct cost categories: a firewall and license renewal totaling about $24,867.36 and one‑time hardware and labor charges of approximately $20,654. The vendor representative, Jeremy, told the board the one‑time hardware purchases include new access points that ship preconfigured and carry three years of licensing, while recurring monthly co‑management fees support critical firewall monitoring at several county sites.

“The one‑time fee for the hardware comes with three years of licensing,” Jeremy said when explaining how new devices are provisioned and why some line items are one‑time costs.

Supervisors sought a clear separation between annual and one‑time charges so they could track recurring budget commitments. TJ and vendor staff agreed to provide a consolidated one‑time total and supporting past invoices; board members had previously asked staff to check prior years’ payments to compare payment cadence and confirm whether contracts shifted from monthly to annual billing.

After questions and clarification, a motion to approve the renewals and replacements passed by voice vote. The board directed staff to ensure future budget documents clearly show the one‑time versus recurring breakout so elected officials can track annual commitments and expected ongoing costs.

The vendor noted monthly co‑management services include remote monitoring and maintenance of firewalls at primary county sites; Jeremy said those critical sites are billed separately and that most other items in the quote are one‑time replacements. The county will continue to review overall IT budget lines during its fall budget work to avoid surprises in the next fiscal year.

The board carried the motion and thanked the vendor for joining remotely to explain the scope and cost details.