Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Toledo council adopts amended FY26 budget, advances plan for 25‑unit mobile‑home court
Summary
At its Oct. 27 meeting the Toledo City Council adopted an amended FY26 budget by roll call and voted to advance a plan for a 25‑unit mobile‑home court on 1st Avenue, contingent on the property sale to the prospective purchaser, Enos Miller.
The Toledo City Council on Oct. 27, 2025, adopted an amended FY26 city budget and voted to move forward with a proposed 25‑unit mobile‑home court, council members said at the meeting held at the Reining Center.
Mayor Brian Sokol opened a public hearing on the FY26 budget amendment at 5:24 p.m.; the clerk reported no written or oral comments were received and the hearing closed at 5:25 p.m. Council member Pansegrau moved to adopt Resolution 2025‑22; Council member Goodhart seconded. The council took a roll‑call vote and all present voiced ayes, carrying the resolution.
Under new business the council heard from Enos Miller, who said he is negotiating to buy a tract on 1st Avenue and provided a preliminary drawing for a 25‑unit mobile‑home court. City staff member Jordan stated the city would not accept responsibility for the streets or utilities. Council member Vesely moved to approve advancing the plan contingent on Miller completing the property purchase; Cook seconded. The motion passed with all present voicing ayes.
The council approved the consent agenda earlier in the meeting, which included minutes from the Oct. 14 meeting, current financial reports, two building permits (#2025‑48 at 503 E. Marshall and #2025‑49 at 505 S. Church), approval of two new retail liquor/tobacco permits (Brew #92 and Brew #104) and a claims list. The clerk’s report showed accounts payable of $449,299.54 and payroll of $37,553.22. Major line items in the claims list included a city insurance payment of $157,664.00, an IEDA grant reimbursement to Shop on the Corner of $190,094.92 and Wellmark premiums of $38,183.88.
The council did not record extended debate on the Miller plan at the meeting; the motion to proceed was explicitly made contingent on the sale to Miller, which is the next step before development approvals or utility/street agreements would be resolved.
The meeting adjourned at 5:39 p.m.
