Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cfd topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff brief council on Community Facilities District process; formal CFD items expected June 23
Summary
Finance director introduced municipal advisor and bond counsel to explain CFDs: special taxes on property secure bonds for infrastructure (not city liability), formation steps, consultants, a 4:1 proposed value-to-lien policy, and an expected action item for council on June 23 to adopt goals and resolutions of intent.
Get email alerts on the Cfd topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
On June 9 the City of Commerce heard an extended informational presentation on Community Facilities Districts (CFDs), a financing tool city staff may use to fund backbone infrastructure for new development.
Finance Director Cassian introduced municipal advisor Dan Masiello and bond counsel Brian Forbath, who explained that a CFD is a land-secured district that can levy a special tax on property within its boundaries to repay bonds. Forbath said CFDs are commonly used to finance streets, sewer, water and other infrastructure and emphasized that bond debt is a limited obligation payable from special taxes on the properties in the CFD — "it's not a liability of the city," he said.
The presenters described typical formation steps: adoption of local goals and policies, a resolution of intention and a public hearing, followed by an election (landowner or registered voter depending on resident count). Forbath said the city is likely to propose a 4-to-1 value-to-lien policy (above the state minimum 3-to-1) and that formation usually takes about three to six months. He added CFDs can also finance services and, in some cases, remediation of hazardous substances — a point raised as relevant to certain projects under consideration.
Councilmembers said the material was detailed and requested follow-up briefings with the city manager and finance director; the staff said a set of action items (local goals and policies and resolutions of intent) will be brought back on June 23 for formal consideration. No formation action occurred on June 9; the presentation was informational and the council received and filed the report.
