Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee sends revised remote‑work resolution to County Council to align with state executive order
Summary
Administration recommended aligning Beaufort County remote‑work rules with the governor's Sept. 11 executive order: limit hybrid remote to two non‑consecutive days per week, restrict out‑of‑state virtual work and require eligibility and HR approvals. Committee forwarded the resolution to County Council for November review.
County administration presented a revised remote‑work resolution to the Finance & Administration Committee on Oct. 20, recommending alignment with Governor McMaster’s Sept. 11 executive order and clearer definitions and limits for telecommuting, hybrid remote and virtual work.
Administration (presenter identified in the transcript as "Miss Mead") outlined three tiers: occasional telecommuting for situational needs, hybrid remote (recurring part‑time remote work) limited to two non‑consecutive days per week, and full virtual work (employees who perform all duties remotely). The draft would exclude out‑of‑state virtual work for administration employees and make hybrid/telecommuting eligibility contingent on position, tenure (one year requirement) and satisfactory performance. Elected officials would retain discretion over their employees, within the state.
Staff emphasized legal and administrative complexities of out‑of‑state employment, including workers' compensation registration, payroll and tax withholding, minimum‑wage and overtime differences, paid‑leave variations by state, and other compliance burdens that would arise if the county allowed employees to be based in other states. HR/administration advised that out‑of‑state virtual work is not recommended for county administration staff and that any elected‑official‑directed exceptions would require coordination with HR, legal, finance and risk management.
Committee members asked questions about elected officials’ latitude, costs (taxation and workers’ comp), and whether county officials would pay travel or relocation costs for out‑of‑state remote employees; staff said those matters would follow existing travel and budget policies and that out‑of‑state arrangements would need individualized legal review. The committee voted to forward the resolution to County Council for further discussion at the November meeting.
What happens next: the resolution will be on the County Council agenda in November for fuller debate and possible adoption; staff said next steps would include legal review of multistate employment laws and any necessary changes to payroll, workers’ comp and benefit administration if out‑of‑state arrangements are authorized.
