Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Conditional Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cusseta–Chattahoochee Commission approves five conditional use permits after public hearings
Summary
After public hearings Feb. 24 and a called meeting Feb. 27, the commission unanimously approved five conditional use permits — for 201 Massey Rd., 711 GA Hwy 26, 109 Nelson St., 136 Patty Dr. and 454 Old Louvale Rd. Approvals remain subject to permits, plat-signing and health-department review.
The Unified Government of Cusseta–Chattahoochee County approved five conditional use permits this month after planning-board recommendations and public hearings, the commission said.
At a called meeting Feb. 27, commissioners voted unanimously to approve applications for 201 Massey Rd. (Mia and Derico Countryman), 711 GA Highway 26 (Julie and Jerome Wooten), 109 Nelson St. (Sierra Smith), 136 Patty Dr. (Curtis Stroud Jr.) and a 1.35-acre parcel carved from Walter Miller’s 52-acre tract at 454 Old Louvale Rd. The approvals follow public hearings held Feb. 24 in which Planning & Zoning recommended approval for each item, typically conditioned on health-department clearance, required permits and compliance with county ordinances.
Why it matters: The decisions affect small-lot building and mobile-home placements across the county and touch on how the county’s zoning ordinance treats substandard lots and manufactured housing. Planning & Zoning members told the commission that the ordinance’s wording has led to CUPs being required in more situations than originally intended, and they urged code clean-up to reduce future uncertainty.
What happened: During the Feb. 24 public hearings, applicants described their plans and Planning & Zoning presented technical findings: the Countrymans said a perk test for their .74-acre lot passed; the Wootens (18.11 acres) reported septic and utilities work but there were questions about whether the required public-notice sign had been posted within the statutory window; Sierra Smith said her existing stick-built house was in poor condition and requested replacement by a mobile home; and Walter Miller asked to plat and convey a 1.35-acre parcel to a tenant who has lived there for 24 years.
Chairman Charles Coffey said the board is trying to be consistent in how it applies rules. At the Feb. 24 work session he warned that ad hoc approvals could create legal exposure, saying, “we are being sued for not being fair,” and arguing the board needed to avoid perceived inconsistency. Planning & Zoning Chair Brent Ingersoll and County Attorney Bin Minter advised commissioners that state zoning-procedure rules and the text of local ordinances determine when a CUP is required and that clarifying ordinance language may be necessary.
Commissioner concerns and process notes: Commissioner Timothy Biddle, who disclosed that his property borders the Wootens’ parcel, said he had no objection but urged caution about potential legal costs, noting, “Your taxes here are pretty cheap, but that money still has to come from somewhere.” Several commissioners also reminded applicants that approvals do not waive county permitting, setbacks, or health-department inspections; plat signing by Planning & Zoning remains a condition for at least one approval.
Votes and next steps: Each CUP was approved by recorded unanimous votes at the Feb. 27 called meeting. The county said applicants must still obtain required building permits, pass health-department inspections where applicable and comply with zoning setbacks or secure variances. Planning & Zoning and the county attorney will continue discussions about whether the zoning code text should be revised to limit unintended CUP triggers.
The Commission adjourned the Feb. 27 called meeting after the votes; applicants should contact county permitting and health officials about next steps.
