Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Swim Facility Renovation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council reviews swim-facility renovation options, hears estimates up to $7.5 million
Summary
Engineers presented three renovation packages for the city swim facility, ranging from roughly $3.8 million to $7.5 million, plus base repairs estimated at $1.5 million; council asked staff for a pro forma and to study Options 2 and 3 more closely.
Get email alerts on the Swim Facility Renovation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public Works Director Arnold invited engineer Jody Dahms of Aquatic Design Solutions to present proposed repairs and three enhancement packages for the city swim facility. Dahms said base repairs — demolition of the existing liner, subgrade stabilization, a concrete pad for liner bonding, electrical grounding and a new pool liner — would cost about $1.5 million.
Dahms described three package options. Option 1 would add east and west peninsulas to stabilize the liner and improve lifeguard visibility, a new mechanical building with pump and heaters, and a zero-depth entry with a play structure for children; he estimated Option 1 at $3.8 million to $4.8 million. Option 2 would add north-side peninsulas to further stabilize the liner and separate deep-water and slide-discharge zones, expand the zero-depth play area and include an optional bathhouse improvement valued at about $1 million; Option 2 was estimated at $4.8 million to $5.2 million (plus the optional bathhouse). Option 3 would include Option 2 features plus bathhouse renovations, a slide tower, expanded deck and shaded areas, with an estimate of $7.1 million to $7.5 million.
Aquatics & Recreation Coordinator Bromley noted that some options could reduce lifeguard staffing needs by improving visibility and response time, potentially lowering operating costs. Council Member Peterson expressed concern that the project is a ‘‘massive expenditure’’ for a facility that is open roughly 70 to 90 days per year and asked staff to prepare financial projections. Council directed staff to return with a pro forma based on one of the options and to review Options 2 and 3 in more detail before any decision.
The presentation did not include a funding decision; Dahms said the firm would assist the city with planning and repair-schedule forecasting.
