Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Surveillance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Advisory council presses for One Health surveillance upgrades and privacy protections to boost farm data sharing

Presidential Advisory Council on Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria (PACCARB) · June 24, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council members told HHS the next National Action Plan must improve comparability and access to AMR data across human, animal and environmental sectors, expand genomic and wastewater surveillance, and create data‑use protections and incentives so producers share farm‑level information.

Council discussion of Goal 2 centered on strengthening One Health surveillance and resolving barriers that limit cross‑sector data sharing.

Several liaison and council members noted fragmentation across human, veterinary and environmental surveillance that undermines comparability. "Building trust between the producer and the government and how that data could be acquired, kept private, and don't be used for, you know, punishing the producer is a key worry out there," Dr. Lucas Pantaleon said, summarizing a recurring objection from agricultural participants. Paul Plummer noted that U.S. human health data benefits from well‑known privacy frameworks (HIPAA) that do not exist equivalently for animal or environmental AMR data, which discourages sharing.

Speakers recommended concrete actions: harmonize definitions and testing methods to make human, animal and environmental datasets comparable; expand funding for continuous programs such as NARMS, FDA Vet‑LIRN and APHIS dashboards; make genomic sequence repositories easier to access and use for cross‑sector work; develop privacy/confidentiality frameworks or statutory protections to reduce economic and reputational risks for producers; and invest in incentives or subsidies so lower‑resourced veterinary diagnostic labs can perform susceptibility testing.

The council also highlighted environmental surveillance gaps (aquatic and crop systems) and urged standardized methods to permit integration with clinical and food surveillance. Members recommended workforce development to operate and interpret genomic and wastewater data and emphasized that surveillance investments must be sustained rather than one‑off pilots.