Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears report on Wisconsin school-funding challenges after Monroe meeting
Summary
Board members reported on a Monroe meeting about state school finance, highlighting concerns with the 1993 equalization formula, special-education funding shortfalls, a proposed FTE-based funding plan, and the possibility of closing the out-of-state lottery-credit loophole to recapture revenue.
Board members reported on a regional meeting in Monroe that focused on Wisconsin school finance and potential reforms.
Ike summarized the session, saying presenters outlined unique Wisconsin funding issues, including a property-tax/lottery-credit arrangement that provides relief to some out-of-state property owners and reduces available aid for in-state districts. "We're the only state that does that," Ike said, describing it as expensive. Bill, recounting a presentation and maps, said the equalization formula in place since 1993 was intended as temporary and has produced disparate outcomes across districts; he said New Glarus is color-coded "orange" on a state map that groups districts by spending patterns and is near the "red" tier.
Speakers at the Monroe meeting discussed a possible FTE-based funding approach in which each student would start with a base FTE of 1.0 and districts would receive higher weighting for students needing more services (examples discussed included 1.2 or 1.5 FTE for higher-need students). Attendees noted this reform would likely be costly and politically challenging. The meeting also included discussion of special education funding shortfalls and how larger-district referendums can shift equalization aid away from others.
Board members said Monroe plans to continue organizing these conversations and that the New Glarus district is interested in participating in future meetings to better inform legislative outreach. No formal district action was taken; this was a report to inform future advocacy and education of local legislators.
Next steps: board members plan to stay engaged with regional discussions and share materials (including a county map of funding designations) with the board.
