Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Madelia planning body opens hearing on Henry Properties zoning requests, hears no objections and adjourns

Madelia Planning and Zoning Commission · March 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Madelia Planning and Zoning Commission opened a public hearing on Feb. 24 to consider Henry Properties’ request for a conditional use permit and a setback variance for a proposed living area at 115 Vensel Avenue SW; staff reported no code violations and the hearing was adjourned after no public objections were recorded.

The Madelia Planning and Zoning Commission on Feb. 24 opened a public hearing on an application from Henry Properties seeking a conditional use permit and a setback variance for a proposed living area at 115 Vensel Avenue Southwest. Staff presented the commission’s facts, findings and recommendations and cited relevant sections of the Madelia zoning code.

According to staff, the property is zoned residential R-1 and the application was evaluated under the City of Madelia Code, chapter 153. Staff referenced the code’s provisions on permissible conditional uses in R-1 districts and read setback rules from chapter 153, section 4 D3, which require new construction not be placed closer to the street than the average setback on the block and generally not within 25 feet of the lot line unless the average setback controls.

Staff told the commission the proposed living area “will not be detrimental to the R-1 district,” is consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan and would not place undue adverse impacts on governmental facilities, utilities, services or public health, safety or welfare. Staff also said the setbacks of surrounding buildings and line-of-sight were considered for the corner lot and that applicable state aid road regulations were reviewed; staff reported no violations were discovered in their review.

The commission invited public comment or objections on the two requests. After a short pause and brief procedural discussion about how long to keep the hearing open for comments, a member moved to adjourn the public hearing and another member seconded. The commission held a voice vote; all in favor were instructed to say “Aye,” and the Chair announced the motion carried, adjourning the hearing.

No public commenters or written objections were recorded in the transcript during the hearing. The Planning and Zoning Commission did not take a final vote on the conditional use permit or the setback variance at this session; the record shows only that the hearing was opened, staff presented findings, the commission solicited public comment, and the hearing was adjourned by voice vote.

Next steps: The commission’s record and staff recommendations are part of the docket; any further action, including deliberation or final votes on the conditional use permit and variance, would appear on a future agenda.