Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Northwest Master Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Park board accepts master plan shaping four northwest Maple Grove neighborhood parks
Summary
The Maple Grove Parks and Recreation Board unanimously accepted a Northwest Maple Grove Park Planning Master Plan that lays out concept designs, planning-level cost estimates and next steps for four neighborhood parks; staff will use the plan to guide land acquisition, design phasing and future CIP requests.
The Maple Grove Parks and Recreation Board voted unanimously on Feb. 19 to accept a Northwest Maple Grove Park Planning Master Plan that establishes conceptual designs and planning-level cost estimates for four future neighborhood parks in the city’s northwest growth area.
Parks and Planning Superintendent Ben Jaszewski told the board the plan, prepared with consultant ISG, synthesizes demographic trends, site assessments, connectivity and amenity menus and provides an opinion of probable cost for each park that includes a 10% contingency and 20% allowance for nonconstruction soft costs. He said the estimates are nonbinding, intended for long-range capital planning, and will guide prioritization, phasing and future budget requests.
Jaszewski said the plan will be used when the city coordinates with developers, landowners and partners such as Three Rivers Park District to secure land, establish park boundaries and trail connections; he described the report as the foundation for future design development, budgeting and construction sequencing. "The opinion is non-binding and intended for long-range capital planning purposes only," he said.
Board members asked staff to clarify several technical items before design moves forward. Board Member Deb Syhre asked that every parking lot be shown with at least one accessible parking stall; Jaszewski agreed he would make that adjustment. Syhre also asked about amenities at PSA 6N; Jaszewski confirmed the park is intended to have one open-air shelter, and he will correct the plan accordingly. Chair Bill Lewis requested that staff and consultants provide a clear definition of "recreational trail" in the document to distinguish paved, asphalt and more-natural trail types used as site circulation and access.
The board discussed cost and phasing tradeoffs, noting that plan-level cost ranges preserve flexibility for final design. Jaszewski summarized how the cost opinions can help the board prioritize amenities, adjust phasing, and revisit selections as funding and development timing evolve. Following discussion, Chair Bill Lewis moved, Board Member Judy Hanson seconded, and the board accepted the master plan by voice vote (seven ayes, no nays).
Next steps identified by staff include referencing the approved master plan in negotiations with landowners and developers, advancing PSA designs when subdivisions occur, and incorporating funding strategies into future Capital Improvement Plan updates.
