Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Easthampton council asks Southampton to reconsider Cook Road cell-tower site; removes RF-health claim
Summary
Easthampton’s council passed an amended resolution opposing a proposed cell tower at 1 Cook Road, Southampton, asking the Southampton Planning Board to explore alternatives and weigh cross-border impacts; council removed language implying documented RF-health harms.
Easthampton — On June 24 the Easthampton City Council unanimously approved a resolution asking the Southampton Planning Board to reconsider a proposed cellular-communications tower sited at 1 Cook Road, immediately across the municipal border. The council said the location raises visual, property-value and neighborhood-character concerns for Easthampton residents who have no vote in Southampton land-use proceedings.
The issue: Councilors and residents argued that siting a tall telecommunications structure on the shared border would impose substantial visual and economic burdens on nearby Easthampton homes. The resolution asked the Southampton Planning Board to require independent, objective analysis of alternate locations and co-location opportunities, and to give “substantial weight” to testimony from surrounding residents whose views, property values and quality of life could be affected.
Language change: During debate, the council removed a clause that described “earnest concerns regarding the long-term effects of radio frequency emissions.” Chair Tom Peake and other councilors said the record does not include definitive scientific findings establishing health harms, and they preferred to avoid asserting unverified health claims in an official intermunicipal communication. The final language asks for caution and for Southampton to consider alternatives and impacts without asserting specific health effects.
Next steps: Councilors said they and the mayor’s office will send the amended resolution to Southampton officials and that council representatives — including Councilors Kuzinski and Smith and Chair Peake — plan to attend the Southampton Planning Board discussion.
Why it matters: The matter highlights how land-use decisions in one town can substantially affect adjacent neighborhoods across municipal borders; the resolution requests transparent review, information sharing, and exploration of less intrusive options before a final approval.
