Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Lmi Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Portsmouth weighs litigation and legislative paths over state LMI housing changes
Summary
Council members and residents sharply debated next steps on a proposed regional legal challenge to recent state housing statutes; staff said a draft complaint is near complete and towns are being asked for input and contributions while parallel work with planners and the League of Cities and Towns continues.
Portsmouth — The Portsmouth Town Council spent a substantial portion of its June 22 meeting discussing the town's response to recent state actions on low‑ and moderate‑income (LMI) housing rules and zoning changes, with staff reporting a near‑final draft complaint and seeking municipal partners for a coordinated regional approach.
Town legal staff told the council the draft complaint is "essentially prepared" and that one town (Hopkinton) had pledged just over $4,000 toward a shared legal effort; the town's own legal expenses to date were reported at roughly $6,700 with another estimated $3,000 to finish drafting. Staff described two parallel paths under consideration: circulating the draft complaint to neighboring towns to assess financial and political support for litigation, and coordinating with the Rhode Island League of Cities and Towns and the state American Planning Association legislative committee to pursue legislative or rule changes.
Public speakers and council members split on strategy. Some speakers argued litigation is necessary and said the issue threatens local planning control and property rights; one resident called the matter "existential" for Portsmouth and warned the town would lose the ability to shape residential zoning if state actions stand. Another resident cited a state audit of LMI spending that, in his view, showed poor results ("Rhode Island spent $644 million ... produced 642 units") and urged caution about relying on state programs. Several council members urged a multi‑front approach: finalize and circulate the draft complaint to solicit other towns' commitments while also engaging planners and legislative avenues during the summer.
Council members and staff acknowledged procedural hurdles: summer council schedules limit how quickly other municipalities can consider pledges, and some towns asked to see a draft complaint before committing funds. Staff said the complaint could be circulated by email in the coming days and recommended waiting until the fall to assess momentum after summer meetings and planner consultations.
What happens next: Staff will finalize internal review of the draft complaint and circulate it to peer towns and the league as requested; the council will monitor responses and revisit commitments in September. The town emphasized it prefers to avoid litigation if a collaborative legislative solution is possible but will pursue legal remedies if necessary to protect local planning authority.
