Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Freedom Scholarships topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State Board approves Education Freedom Scholarship rule amid questions on timing, data and privacy
Summary
The State Board of Education adopted rules to implement the new Education Freedom Scholarship program, approving a clerk’s amendment and voting unanimously. Board members pressed department staff on application volume, timing for private-school admissions, income-data collection, and the statutory requirement to report a statistical TCAP sample.
The State Board of Education on final reading adopted rules to implement Tennessee’s new Education Freedom Scholarship (EFS) program, approving a clerical amendment and passing the rule by roll-call vote.
Assistant Commissioner Trudy Hughes told the board the department had launched program materials and an application portal and was preparing to administer awards for the 2025–26 school year. Chair Eie and other members praised the department’s rapid implementation work, noting that the portal had already received tens of thousands of applications: “as of yesterday at 8 a.m., we had 40,323 applications,” a figure cited by the chair during discussion.
Why it matters: The EFS program directs state scholarship funding to private schools for eligible students. The rule clarifies eligibility, appeals, application logistics and reporting obligations, and narrows the department’s regulatory authority to requirements necessary to operate the program.
Board members focused on three implementation questions. First, timing: several members said private schools typically finalize enrollment and staffing plans in late winter and spring, creating a potential mismatch if scholarship awards arrive late in the admissions cycle. Amy Owen of the department agreed that the program’s first year faced compressed timelines and said staff would seek adjustments in future cycles to align applications and award notices with private-school calendars.
Second, privacy and data collection: the rule requires the department to request certain documents for verification but — following consultation with the Office of Administration — staff clarified that private schools should provide income or verification information only if they already collect it, not by creating new data collection burdens. The department’s representative on the call confirmed: “schools should only provide this information if schools already collect such data.”
Third, reporting and the TCAP sample: the statute requires the department to prepare an annual report on a statistical sample of EFS recipients in grades 3–8 who were administered TCAP. Board members asked how sample sizes would be chosen and whether small counts would prevent publishing results. Department staff said the sample approach follows standard accountability practices: the department will aim for a sample sufficient to generate a 95% confidence interval representative of the recipient pool and noted that very small end counts could prevent reporting to protect student privacy. Staff identified a common end-count threshold used in other reporting (about 30 students) as a practical point at which school- or district-level reporting becomes possible.
An amendment proposed by legal staff shifted a parenthetical phrase for clarity in the TCAP-sample provision; the board approved the clerical change and then approved the rule as amended by roll call. Mr. Griffin read votes for each member; the board recorded unanimous approval.
The board also discussed potential unintended consequences — including athletic eligibility rules and private-school fiscal calendars — and members asked department staff to continue outreach and post-implementation adjustments. The department said it would issue FAQs and continue webinars and stakeholder sessions.
What’s next: The rule is effective as adopted; the department will continue application processing and said it will refine timing and communication in subsequent cycles based on stakeholder feedback.
