Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council seeks clearer variance filings after messy 425 Lake application
Summary
Council and the city planner concluded the 425 Lake variance application was incomplete and inconsistent after multiple post‑hearing changes; council urged pre-application concept review, waived an amended-application fee for the applicant, and asked staff to include explicit variance lists and conditions in future reports.
The council spent substantial time addressing problems with a variance application for 425 Lake, concluding that the applicant’s plans changed after the Planning Commission hearing and that additional variances (impervious-surface calculations, shoreland setbacks, wall height and buffer rules) might be required.
Ben Wickstrom, the city planner, told the council the application “got a little convoluted” because plans changed between hearings. He said the retaining-wall and boulder features raised questions about how the city counts impervious surface and whether sidewalks or narrow landscape features should be excluded. "Traditionally we have counted basically every single square foot of wall surface," Wickstrom said, noting some other communities exempt narrow sidewalks under certain thresholds.
Council members pressed for clearer pre-application guidance and stronger completeness checks. Councilmember Ryan and others recommended encouraging applicants to use the Planning Commission’s concept-review option so projects are vetted before formal submission. The planner and council agreed the city should require applicants to demonstrate compliance with other governmental regulations where applicable and to list every code section that could require a variance so conditions can be attached to approvals.
To address the immediate applicant burden caused by shifting requirements, the council voted to waive the amended-application fee for the 425 Lake applicant so the re-submission can proceed without additional cost. Council also asked staff to resume a practice of producing formal variance approval resolutions with explicit conditions tied to code intent.
Next steps: staff will update the variance application/checklist to require clear justification for omitted items and to encourage concept review; the city will waive the fee for the amended 425 Lake submission and follow up with the applicant about required variances and any necessary pre-application meetings.
