Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Library topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council reviews library feasibility study estimating $420K retrofit, option to add 800 sq ft

Blackduck City Council · July 22, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A consultant study presented three options for Blackduck’s library (retrofit, reconfiguration, or 800 sq ft addition); estimated costs for remodeling the existing footprint were about $420,000, the 800 sq ft addition about $256,000, and completing all items could push combined costs toward $1.1 million. Council asked staff and the library board to review the study before deciding next steps in August.

Councilors reviewed a feasibility study that evaluated the current library building, recommended space improvements and presented three concept layouts: a retrofit focused on the existing footprint (Option A), a reconfigured interior with improved sightlines (Option B), and an 800-square-foot addition intended to capture all desired program elements.

The consultant’s cost illustrations estimate roughly $420,000 to remodel the existing footprint; an 800-square-foot addition was estimated at about $256,000. The consultant noted that, with design, contingency and soft costs, pursuing all recommended work could raise the total toward $1.1 million. Council members repeatedly stressed that addressing roof and water-intrusion issues should be prioritized before larger renovations.

Members agreed the library board and staff should have an opportunity to review the study and provide feedback. One council member noted safety concerns identified in the report — including lack of clearance in front of electrical panels and storage near a water heater — and urged those items be addressed in any plan.

Staff said the library board had not yet reviewed the revised draft and recommended the matter be revisited at the August meeting after staff and board input are collected.