City adopts tree‑replacement resolution, amending language to 'support' replacement amid funding questions

The Pittsburg City Commission on June 23 approved Resolution 1303, which formally expresses the city’s support for replacing trees removed from city property, after commissioners agreed to soften the original language from an obligation to a supportive commitment.

A member of the Sustainability Advisory Committee (identified in the meeting record as a presenter) outlined the committee’s research on Tree City standards from the Arbor Day Foundation and said the city has been recognized as a Tree City for 21 years but may not be meeting all standards. The committee proposed steps including a public‑tree‑care ordinance, an Arbor Day observance, and a municipal tree farm to grow replacement saplings.

"We put together this resolution number 1303," the presenter said, explaining the benefits of urban trees and noting recent storm losses, utility‑line removals and budget pressures. Committee members told commissioners the city spends roughly $100,000 a year on tree removal and maintenance across parks and corridors and urged a coordinated approach to replanting.

Commissioners questioned the financial and staffing implications of a requirement to replace every removed tree within 12 months. After discussion, commissioners agreed to change the operative language from "the city shall replace" to wording indicating the city will "assist" or "support" replacement and directed staff and the committee to return with implementation options, potential grant sources and volunteer or sponsorship models. The amended resolution passed on a voice vote.

The committee suggested several funding and delivery options — a tree farm at the municipal golf course, K‑State Extension spring plant programs, sponsorships and volunteer planting events — and staff encouraged the group to outline practical, phased measures for future commission review.