Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects Electric Department topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council discusses replacing Electric Department facility; architects’ quotes presented, rent vs. build debate continues
Summary
Council reviewed a lease-back plan tied to the sale of the Chrysler Center, heard three architecture quotes to design a replacement Electric Department facility, and debated renting existing space versus building a new, secure structure; council requested more detailed facility needs and asked the Electric superintendent to appear at the next meeting.
City staff updated the Olivia City Council on plans to relocate the Electric Department after the proposed sale of the Chrysler Center and presented three architecture proposals to design a replacement facility. The purchase agreement under negotiation would include a 12-month lease-back of the current space while the city identifies and prepares a new site.
Staff presented quotes from three firms: Inan Associates (low-cost quote to finish prior work), Hogan Architecture (quote that excluded soils, survey and civil engineering), and Outsource Architecture (higher quote including additional services). Staff said the city prefers to build with proceeds from the Chrysler sale plus electric fund reserves to avoid bonding and aims to have plans out for public bid in February or, depending on scope, by spring.
Council discussion focused on cost, timing and alternatives. Staff reported current construction estimates in the discussion at roughly $860,000 to $960,000; council members raised concerns about adding another maintenance liability and urged that rental or existing public facilities (the Armory or county Public Works building) be fully explored. Staff countered that door-height requirements and security needs limit suitable rental options. One council member asked for documentation of a lease-search and suggested the Electric Department superintendent present a detailed rundown of operations and facility needs at the January meeting.
No architect selection or construction authorization occurred; council asked staff to return with additional analysis and a facility overview from the Electric superintendent before any decision. The transcript records staff noting a redline on the Chrysler purchase agreement that involves vacating a road and the need to address access easements in later council action.
