Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Levy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Olivia staff presents proposed 9% levy increase in Truth in Taxation presentation; no public comment
Summary
At a Truth in Taxation presentation, staff outlined a proposed 9% increase in the 2025 levy (a figure presented verbally as equating to about $5,399 in total increase) and detailed fund-by-fund impacts; the public hearing drew no testimony and the council reconvened regular business.
Get email alerts on the Budget Levy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff presented the proposed 2025 levy during a Truth in Taxation session, saying the levy would rise about 9% from 2024 and summarizing how that change affects different funds and household impacts.
Staff said the 9% levy increase "equates to a total of $5,399" in the presentation and walked through a series of slides breaking down revenues and expenditures across funds. The general fund was identified as the largest portion of the levy; staff called out a slide item labeled roughly as a "31,700 $41" increase from 2024 to 2025 for the general fund (as shown on the slides), a $550 increase for the library fund tied to program funding, and a $5,000 increase for fire and TRT purposes to maintain operations. Debt-service increases were attributed primarily to 2024 bond issuances for a pool project, and a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) increase of $56,600 was shown as part of a multi-year plan to reduce reliance on electric-fund transfers.
Staff explained that the city tax rate is the levy divided by the county-determined tax capacity and that individual household impacts vary with assessed market value. "If your home value did stay the same, your city tax actually would have had a decrease from 24 to 25," staff said, noting the slide was an example that holds a single parcel’s value fixed for comparison.
Council opened the public-comment portion of the Truth in Taxation hearing and received no in-person or virtual testimony; the hearing was closed and the council resumed the fee-schedule discussion. No formal action on the levy was taken at this meeting; the presentation served as the staff explanation and public-notice step ahead of subsequent budget deliberations.

