Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wastewater Reconstruction topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Independence Council startled by $58 million wastewater bid; award delayed while officials seek funding options
Summary
Council members learned the low bid for the wastewater treatment plant rebuild came in at about $58.18 million — far above earlier estimates — and agreed to delay awarding the contract until July 13 while staff explores financing and possible scope or procurement changes.
Independence — At its June 8 meeting, the Independence City Council was presented with unexpectedly high bids for a long-planned wastewater treatment plant overhaul and voted to delay awarding the construction contract while staff pursues funding options and cost-saving measures.
The city received three bids for the project: Woodruff Construction (low) at $58,176,300; Wendler WL Inc. at $61,900,000; and Tricon General Construction at $66,700,000. Council members and residents pressed staff about why the numbers were so far above prior planning estimates, which ranged from roughly $30–35 million in early planning to $43 million when the city applied for a loan.
Bradley, the engineering representative on the project, said the low bids are the market reality. "The current bids that we received that the mayor read actually were very competitive," he told the council, and noted the number of subcontractors pursuing work and the distribution of unit-price risk in the current post‑COVID bidding climate. He explained that engineers provide an opinion of probable construction cost but cannot set the contractors' unit prices, which are developed by bidders and can vary widely.
Council members repeatedly questioned a gap of roughly $11–15 million from the $43 million figure discussed in recent meetings. Staff told the council the $43 million figure reflected the loan application amount and a planned city contribution that had been described to taxpayers; the new bids exceed that consolidated figure and would require additional financing or scope adjustments.
Officials discussed options that would require restarting the procurement process — including value engineering or rebidding to require American‑made components to meet certain funding requirements — and noted restarting could add months to the schedule and additional cost pressure. Staff also described savings incorporated into current design, including planned reuse of the Headworks building, administration building and certain tanks.
Council members stressed the plant's operational risk if repairs are delayed. Staff noted some critical equipment is nearly 50 years old and said delays could leave the plant dependent on scarce replacement parts. Construction duration estimates discussed at the meeting ranged to three to three-and-a-half years.
Because the council had not been presented with a concrete funding plan for the higher bids, members agreed not to award the contract at the June 8 meeting. Staff said it will present financing scenarios, potential grant or loan adjustments, and any recommended design/value-engineering options at the July 13 meeting, when the city may consider contract award.
Background: The city previously projected a lower construction cost in early planning. The engineer and council attributed much of the increase to unit-price volatility, supply-chain issues and higher labor unit costs on large treatment-plant projects, and emphasized that rebidding or changing specifications would require restarting the procurement process so all bidders could respond to the modified scope.
Next steps: Staff will meet with bond and loan advisors and return to council on July 13 with funding scenarios and recommendations. The council did pass an earlier, separate resolution on June 8 confirming the plans and specifications as the next step in the formal procurement sequence, but the construction contract was not awarded that night.
