Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Redevelopment authority affirms planning commission on fill permit; approves tree removal and bond release
Summary
The Hobart City Redevelopment Authority affirmed the planning commission's grant of a fill permit (petition 2601) and approved related administrative measures including a tree removal at 7798 Tanager Street, a refund of building permit 2657, and conditional release of a performance bond for Lumen's Logistics.
The Hobart City Redevelopment Authority affirmed the planning commission’s decision to grant a fill permit under petition number 2601 and approved several routine administrative items at its meeting. The chair (S1) moved to affirm the planning commission’s decision after noting written and on‑the‑record evidence, and the motion carried on a voice vote with no opposing voices recorded.
The chair (S1) read a list of appellants who had filed appeals against the planning commission decision. Staff (S3) advised the authority that it had the power to affirm, modify or reverse the planning commission decision and that any written notices of the board’s decision would be sent to the parties who filed appeals. As recorded in the meeting, the chair stated: “Having considered all of the evidence presented both in writing and on the record ... and the Hoover Municipal Road Section 15904, which has to do with the fill permits,” and moved to affirm the planning commission’s action on petition 2601.
The authority handled several other agenda actions by voice vote. The board granted a request to remove a locust tree in the public easement at 7798 Tanager Street and approved that the property owners would bear the cost; a resident (S2) told the board the homeowners had consulted an arborist and planned to remove the tree themselves. The board also approved a refund for building permit number 2657 (Windham Nation) and approved release of a performance bond for Lumen’s Logistics on the condition that a maintenance bond be put in place.
The authority also set an unsafe‑building item (300 West Old Bridge Road) over for further consideration on April 15 after hearing that the property owner had submitted subdivision paperwork to the planning commission and intends to remove the structure if the subdivision is approved. The board’s motions were made and carried by voice vote; the meeting record shows “Aye” responses and no recorded oppositions.
The authority did not record roll‑call vote tallies in the meeting transcript; the decisions will be communicated in writing to the parties who filed appeals or requests, as noted by staff (S3).
