Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bradley County law enforcement committee flags jail capacity, equipment upgrades and contract tradeoffs
Summary
At the Jan. 28 Law Enforcement Committee meeting, staff reported TCI Tier 1 accreditation could add roughly $171,252 per year, aging jail locks and camera/server upgrades were prioritized, Axon body‑camera contract options were presented, and the committee discussed revenue risks tied to inmate‑calling rules and drone replacement costs while noting the jail is near capacity.
County law enforcement officials and committee members reviewed security, technology and staffing pressures at a Jan. 28, 2025 Law Enforcement Committee meeting, flagging both one‑time capital needs and recurring costs that could affect future budgets.
Amber Owens reported the Sheriff’s Office applied for Tennessee Corrections Institute (TCI) Tier 1 accreditation funding; if approved by the Tennessee Department of Corrections the accreditation could yield an additional roughly $3 per state inmate per day, which staff estimated could amount to about $171,252 annually. Committee discussion focused on whether that revenue stream, if approved, would meaningfully offset other rising costs.
Dewayne Scoggins and Sheriff Steve Lawson described equipment and facility needs. The committee heard that 375 jail locks installed in 2003 are no longer mass‑produced: a full replacement and retrofit was quoted at approximately $1.4 million; a smaller interim purchase of 20 replacement locks was quoted at about $76,000, and the sheriff said he hopes to reallocate existing funds to purchase the interim set before fiscal year end. A vendor quote to upgrade server storage and replace analog cameras was presented at roughly $363,000; Sheriff Lawson said the department hopes to move about $150,000 to that project by year end.
Staff presented two purchasing options for Axon body‑camera and related services: a 10‑year structure with lower initial years (first five years at ~$199,600 and later years at ~$233,400) and a 10‑year flat‑cost option at roughly $216,500 per year. The sheriff expressed preference for equipping patrol cars with upgraded cameras to replace older units.
Committee members discussed external revenue risks: Scoggins and other staff noted that changes tied to the Martha Wright‑Reed Act and forthcoming FCC guidelines (effective April 2026 as noted in the record) are expected to reduce the cap on inmate‑calling costs, a change staff estimated could reduce annual revenue by about $156,000. The committee also heard that current drones used by the sheriff’s office would be grandfathered under a possible new law requiring American‑made drones, but replacement American‑made drones were estimated at $25,000–$45,000 each if future purchases are needed. Staff requested $11,000 to continue a Clear Intelligence subscription when grant funding ends and reported recurring costs for license‑plate‑reader (LPR) deployments — including pole fees, SIM cards and electricity — totaling $25,431 annually.
Sheriff Lawson told the committee that jail population levels remain near capacity and urged planning for expansion; one planning option discussed was adding a one‑level, roughly 100‑bed dormitory for minimum‑security inmates. The committee reviewed a list of unbudgeted maintenance items anticipated in the next budget, including a body scanner (~$11,225), a fingerprint machine (~$2,300), an MTI control board (~$25,000), drone maintenance/parts (~$10,000) and LPR camera costs (~$25,431/year).
No formal county commission votes were recorded in the committee minutes; staff and the sheriff described budget reallocation hopes and requests for the upcoming budget cycle.
