Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Board Goals topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Delaware Valley board sets six goals, prioritizes K–12 articulation and education foundation kickstart

Delaware Valley Regional High School District Board of Education · June 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Delaware Valley Regional High School District board on Jan. 13 adopted a six‑point set of board goals for the coming year emphasizing an education foundation kickstart, improved data‑sharing and K–12 articulation among seven sending districts, a formal training cadence, better two‑way communications with communities, and fiscal and operational stability.

The Delaware Valley Regional High School District Board of Education laid out six priority goals for the coming year, centering on student pathway alignment and community engagement. The board tasked officers to draft goal language and present the package at the next public meeting for formal memorialization.

Board members opened the Jan. 13 meeting by inviting ideas for actionable items. Among the items the board agreed to prioritize were: (1) maintaining financial stability and avoiding unnecessary debt while using federal and state aid where appropriate; (2) sustaining operational excellence and proactive facilities management; (3) improving coordination and two‑way communications with the seven sending districts and the public; (4) establishing a scheduled training and development cadence (orientation, annual ethics training) with NJSBA (to be shepherded by the policy committee); (5) pursuing sending‑district articulation (a K–12 pathway effort, with an initial K–2 marker and proposals to follow students from sixth grade through high school); and (6) kickstarting an education foundation tied to student affairs to raise volunteer and financial support.

Board members discussed concrete steps meant to make the goals actionable rather than purely aspirational. They cited a five‑year student‑data analysis prepared by student affairs — presented earlier by Mr. McKenna — as a resource the board can share with sending districts so local boards can use their own district data in context rather than as a ranking. Members proposed superintendent and board‑president meetings as coordination venues and suggested supervisor‑level pilot meetings (for example, music supervisors) to test cross‑district curricula and co‑curricular alignment.

On co‑curriculars, Mr. Hayden offered a practical example of how music and sports collaborations have already produced tangible benefits: "Hey man, you guys have Kingwood. We got all clarinets and Holland, you have all clarinets. I'm gonna have 80 clarinets up here. No trumpets, no trombones. What did we have to do to mix this up a little bit to build the good band when it comes up?" He and others said informal successes — joint band and choir events, shared tournaments — could be formalized and scaled.

Members emphasized tracking: the group recommended revisiting goals at regular intervals (Oct./Nov./Dec.) to check for progress and requested the chair circulate written goal language for refinement before the next meeting. For training and governance, members asked the policy committee to draft a memorialized schedule of trainings and retreats so the cadence persists year‑to‑year.

The board did not take formal policy action at the meeting on program changes; members agreed the next step is to circulate the proposed goal language by email and bring a memorialized version back to the full board for public presentation and vote.