Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Strategic Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fargo board receives first reading of strategic plan, debates timing of state data and attendance targets
Summary
Board members reviewed a concise strategic plan draft that sets measurable targets across academics, well-being, staffing, partnerships and operations; members pressed administrators on delayed state assessment data and whether attendance and fiscal metrics are ambitious yet attainable.
At a lengthy first reading, Fargo district administrators presented a condensed strategic plan that outlines measurable objectives across five priority areas: academic excellence; student safety, health and well-being; exemplary staffing; community engagement; and operational excellence.
Dr. Steiner said the board’s version of the plan is intentionally concise — four to five pages with a scorecard of metrics administrators will use for accountability. She described the plan as driven by targets that the board should use to hold administration accountable. “These are the metrics as a board you would hold myself accountable for,” Dr. Steiner said.
A central point of debate was the timing of finalized state assessment results. Administrators said the department of public instruction’s NDA Plus assessments experienced norming and reporting issues, delaying finalized results that the district had expected sooner. That delay, they said, may push the district’s ability to set final academic targets into late summer or early fall.
Board members urged workable interim steps rather than waiting for perfect data. Planning chair Greg Clark suggested adopting provisional targets (for example, a modest percent increase from the prior year) so the board need not delay approvals while awaiting the state’s finalized figures.
Attendance was flagged as a district critical objective: administrators noted roughly 75% of students attended 90% or more school days, and the district reported a 6.5% gain in many buildings this year. Board members questioned whether the proposed incremental targets were ambitious enough for a critical objective that impacts funding and student outcomes.
The plan also includes a community partnerships measure — district staff reviewed contracts to identify formal partnerships that offer better value than market alternatives — and a staffing goal tied to Vital network survey results on employee satisfaction and retention. Administrators said additional operational definitions, building-level baselines, and reporting cadence will be provided as they finalize the plan.
The board did not take action on the plan; Dr. Steiner asked for approval to proceed under the metrics presented and to return with data-driven targets once final state and local data are available. Board members asked that the administration provide interim targets and clearer definitions for partnership and attendance metrics before the next formal approval.
