Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Aquatics Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission sends revised youth aquatics partnership policy to council as one‑year pilot
Summary
The Beaches, Parks and Recreation Commission voted to forward a proposed one‑year pilot that lowers residency thresholds, removes minimum participant counts, moves to swipe‑based verification and changes discounts for youth aquatic partners. Commissioners asked staff to remove a 14‑day cancellation penalty and clarify long‑course billing.
The Beaches, Parks and Recreation Commission voted to refer a revised youth aquatics partnership policy to the City Council as a one‑year pilot after staff said the changes would modernize enrollment verification and better align discounts with resident participation.
Parks and Recreation aquatic supervisor Carrie Sorts told the commission the existing policy — modeled on field sports — has required frequent exceptions and “has not been working since 2018.” She said the proposal lowers residency thresholds to 78% (tier 1), 70% (tier 2) and 60% (tier 3), removes rigid minimum participant counts for tier eligibility, and shifts day‑to‑day billing for routine practices to a swipe‑based system backed by annual rosters.
The proposed discount structure reduces the top tier discount to 55% (tier 1), 50% (tier 2) and 35% (tier 3), reflecting the lower residency thresholds, Sorts said. Staff recommended forwarding the draft to council as a one‑year pilot so the city can evaluate operational impacts before making permanent changes.
Why it matters: The city partners with nonprofit swim and water polo organizations to provide year‑round aquatic programs it cannot operate directly. The policy determines which organizations receive subsidized pool access, how much they pay, and how the city verifies resident participation. Changes affect program costs, pool allocation and the stability of local youth teams.
Commissioners pressed staff for clarifications about how discounts change costs for participants, enforcement of violations and whether a small program could manipulate percentage‑based tiers. In response, staff said swipe data would supplement rosters for verification and that enforcement intends progressive warnings followed by penalties for repeated noncompliance rather than immediate punitive action.
Community groups told the commission they support modernization but asked for guardrails. “Youth sports are inherently dynamic,” said Anissa Brmley during public comment, urging a 75% residency benchmark and cautioning that ordinary roster fluctuations should not threaten a program’s access to pool time. Amanda Blanca, who identified herself as the president of the San Aquatics team, said her team would qualify under the proposed thresholds but asked that the pilot avoid frequent re‑review and that enforcement provisions be clarified so small administrative errors do not lead to loss of pool time.
What the commission did: Commissioners proposed two edits before forwarding the policy: remove a 14‑day cancellation penalty (section 5.7.5) and clarify billing differences for 25‑yard versus long‑course (50‑yard/long‑course) rentals. The commission voted to forward the draft to City Council with those changes and to treat the measure as a one‑year pilot. The motion passed unanimously.
Next steps: The item will go to City Council for consideration as a one‑year pilot; staff will monitor swipe data, roster reporting and enforcement impacts during the pilot and report back to the commission as directed.
