Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Residential Renovation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Zoning board approves modest variances at 35 Maple Street to restore porch and add bedroom

Board of Zoning Appeals · January 27, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board approved three variances for Peter and Shari Bullen at 35 Maple Street on Jan. 27, allowing a front porch restoration and a rear addition that requires 3 feet 6 inches variances for both front and rear setbacks and resolves an existing nonconforming garage encroachment.

The Board of Zoning Appeals voted unanimously on Jan. 27 to approve three variance requests for Peter and Shari Bullen at 35 Maple Street (Permanent Parcel No. 932-05-003). The requests addressed a nonconforming garage, a front porch restoration and a rear porch addition.

Jamieson summarized that the property requires relief from Section 1145.02(b) governing nonconforming buildings and Section 1125.03(f) and (h) for front- and rear-yard setbacks. Architect Mr. Clemens said the house was historically part of a connected structure spanning two properties; the proposed rear porch would create a functional third bedroom with a modest ensuite while the front porch would restore a historical feature.

The variances are limited in size: the front porch would have a 25-foot 6-inch setback instead of the required 29 feet (a 3-foot 6-inch variance), and the rear porch would likewise be 25-foot 6-inches rather than the required 29 feet. The existing attached garage extends 28 feet 6 inches into the 29-foot rear yard, making the building nonconforming. As a trade-off, the applicants agreed to remove a nonconforming front driveway from Maple Street to Walnut Street and replace it with landscaping.

Neighbor Susan Junker, who previously owned the house, supported the application and supplied historical photos showing the house originally had a front porch. Ms. Rachel Freshman-Johnson moved to approve the variances, saying they were modest and would improve neighborhood character; Mr. Jim Holdren seconded. The roll call vote was unanimous. The Board noted there is a 15-day appeal period to Council for the decision.

Next steps: approvals are final subject to the 15‑day appeal period.