Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Forest View Estates topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dania Beach commission directs staff to pursue title and prepare homeowner transfer terms for disputed Forest View parcel
Summary
After hearing a multi-year history of broken site-plan commitments, the Dania Beach commission asked the city attorney to secure title to a 0.28-acre Forest View parcel offered by the developer and to draft conditions for transfer to the homeowners association, contingent on a clean title report and covenants restricting resale and commercial use.
Get email alerts on the Forest View Estates topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Dania Beach City Commission on June 23 instructed city staff to seek title and prepare a deed-transfer agreement for a 0.28-acre lot in the Forest View Estates development that was tied to a never-built community facility.
City Attorney Bootsis traced the lot’s regulatory history, saying the 2003 site plan for 31 homes included a community room on parcel 3517, the lot was dedicated to the city in 2015 as an offset for park impact fees, then re-transferred to the developer in 2016 and re-approved in 2017 for a 1,400-square-foot community facility that was never constructed. Bootsis told the commission the city started enforcement, the developer was cited, and the developer’s attorneys offered to deed the parcel to the city rather than continue with foreclosure or special-magistrate proceedings.
Homeowners and their counsel told the commission the parcel was promised to the community and remains their only common space. Elizabeth Summersted, counsel for the homeowners association, summarized the record and the residents’ request for the city to accept the deed or otherwise hold the developer to the obligation. Resident Jonathan Levine said, “I cannot see a situation in which that land did not come back to the residents,” urging the commission to preserve the parcel for community use.
Commission debate focused on fairness to homeowners versus the city’s fiscal stewardship. Vice Mayor Salvino and other commissioners emphasized that the city should not simply give away an asset without protections. The commission directed staff to obtain a title opinion, accept the developer’s offer if the title is clear, and then prepare an agreement to transfer the parcel to the homeowners association for common use with covenants preventing resale for profit and requiring HOA maintenance. Commissioners stipulated the transfer would be contingent on a clean title report and the drafting of deed restrictions that preserve the lot’s use for the community.
The motion (made by Vice Mayor Salvino and seconded by Commissioner Romaine) passed unanimously.
Next steps: staff will review the developer-supplied title opinion, bring a proposed transfer agreement back to the commission for approval, and outline any site-plan modification or HOA-document updates required to reflect the lot’s intended common-use status.

