Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Snowflake council approves $107,848 tank rehabilitation contract and clears right-of-way; buys used compactor

Town Council of Snowflake · June 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Snowflake Town Council unanimously approved a $107,848 contract for the Snowflake Heights Tank rehabilitation, authorized abandonment of an unimproved right-of-way on S Brewer Lane at the owner's request, and approved purchase of a used Caterpillar compactor.

Snowflake's Town Council on Nov. 3 unanimously approved three procurement and land-use items: awarding the Snowflake Heights Tank Rehabilitation Project to Paul R. Peterson Construction for $107,848, abandoning a never-improved town right-of-way on S Brewer Lane at the request of property owner Robb Hatch, and purchasing a used Caterpillar compactor to replace the town's 2000 model.

Town staff presented the bids and recommendations during the council's Discussion/Action portion of the agenda. Brian Richards recommended Paul R. Peterson Construction as the lowest qualified bidder; Conco Concrete Specialists' bid was rejected as not qualified. The council approved the award by motion (mover: Cory Johnson; second: Byron Lewis) with a unanimous vote.

On the right-of-way item, Richards said the strip of town-owned land on S Brewer Lane had never been improved and did not conform to the town's general plans; the owner, Robb Hatch, requested abandonment. Ballard moved to approve abandonment and Perkins seconded; the motion passed unanimously.

Council also voted to purchase a used Caterpillar compactor and to sell the town's older compactor at auction. Flake moved the purchase; Lynn Johnson seconded and the motion passed unanimously.

The approvals were handled as separate motions but recorded consecutively on the agenda. The council approved a consent agenda earlier in the meeting that included minutes and the October check register.

The council did not set implementation dates or contract start dates on the record; staff indicated the recommended contractor was the lowest qualified bidder and the town will proceed with contracting and project scheduling through its standard procurement process.