Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Property Maintenance Code topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bucyrus committee votes to request redlined update of property-maintenance code

International Property Maintenance Code Ad Hoc Committee · June 23, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Bucyrus International Property Maintenance Code ad hoc committee voted June 23 to ask staff to produce a redlined version of the most recent International Property Maintenance Code showing proposed deletions and additions so the committee can identify unenforceable provisions and prepare a locally tailored code.

The Bucyrus International Property Maintenance Code ad hoc committee voted June 23 to ask staff to produce a redlined version of the most recent International Property Maintenance Code for the committee's review.

The motion, made by Jared Miller and approved by roll call, asks Brandon (staff) to prepare and circulate a redline of the most recent IPMC that shows text to be removed and text to be added so members can identify sections they consider unenforceable and agree on local changes. The committee set its next meeting for July 8, 2026, at 4:00 p.m.; the session adjourned at 4:20 p.m.

Why it matters: members said much of the national code includes provisions geared to larger multiunit buildings and other situations that Bucyrus cannot reasonably enforce, so the committee wants a clear, redlined working document rather than a condensed draft with unclear deletions. Several members asked to see both the prior Ratliff draft and Brandon's version so the group can compare proposed removals against the most recent national text.

During discussion, committee members debated which baseline to use. Some urged starting with the most recent International Property Maintenance Code (members referenced a 2024 edition), then striking out sections that do not apply locally; others noted Bucyrus currently operates under the 2012 IPMC and asked for clarity about which sections were changed in prior drafts. A member asked whether references in definitions (for example, to a "health commissioner") should instead refer to "the health department" to reflect local administrative structure.

"I'll make a motion to have Brandon prepare a redlined version of the 2024 or current 'most recent' code that's available," Miller said when moving the proposal. The motion was seconded and carried on a roll-call vote with all members present voting yes. Absent members were Sierra Shurick and Clarissa Slater, who were noted as not present in roll call.

The committee directed staff to provide the redlined document before the next meeting so members can review the specific deletions and additions line-by-line. Committee members said they prefer a redline that strikes out removed text and highlights added language so the group can discuss whether to retain, modify or remove particular provisions.

Next steps: staff (Brandon) is to prepare and circulate the redlined working document of the most recent IPMC to committee members ahead of the July 8 meeting. The committee will reconvene to review specific sections and determine recommended local changes to the property-maintenance code.

The meeting opened at 4:00 p.m. and adjourned at 4:20 p.m.