Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Sheriff asks Inwood council to raise per-capita law-enforcement payment to $65.35

Inwood City Council · January 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lyon County Sheriff Brian Hilt asked the Inwood City Council to increase the city's per-capita payment under the county's 28E law-enforcement agreement from $27 (about $25,056 annually) to $65.35 per capita, proposing a phased five-year increase and a suggested FY26-27 contribution of $36,387; Council delayed action for further discussion.

Sheriff Brian Hilt told the Inwood City Council on Jan. 5 that he wants the city to increase its per-capita payment under the Lyon County 28E law-enforcement agreement from $27 to $65.35, with a gradual rise over five years. He said the current $27 rate amounts to $25,056 annually for Inwood and that the county's recommendation would raise the city's suggested FY26-27 contribution to $36,387.

The request was reviewed during the regular council meeting presided over by Mayor Becca Bixler. Hilt described the proposed per-capita figure and the proposed phasing but the council did not vote and instead left the matter for further consideration at a future meeting.

Why this matters: the 28E agreement governs shared law-enforcement service funding among Lyon County and its cities; raising the per-capita charge would increase Inwood's annual budgeted transfer to the county and could require adjustments elsewhere in the city budget. Council members asked for more information before deciding on a course of action.

Council finance impacts: the transcript records the current payment ($27 per capita, $25,056 annually) and the sheriff's suggested new rate ($65.35 per capita) and an FY26-27 suggested contribution ($36,387). The council did not set a schedule or adopt a phased plan during the Jan. 5 meeting.

Next steps: Council members said discussion will continue; no formal motion or timeline for adoption was recorded at the Jan. 5 session.