Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Homelessness Services topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Madison County approves one-time funding to support Haven of Hope shelter and One Stop referral hub

Madison County Fiscal Court · June 23, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The fiscal court approved two one-time funding partnerships with the City of Richmond: $22,500 toward the Haven of Hope shelter lease and $163,598.96 (county share) toward the One Stop Resource & Referral Hub's FY27 funding gap. Monica Barnes, Haven of Hope founder, described the volunteer-run shelter and its caseload.

Madison County’s Fiscal Court voted to provide one-time funding to two Richmond-area social-service efforts, agreeing to split costs the city requested for the Haven of Hope homeless shelter and the One Stop Resource & Referral Hub.

The court approved resolution 2026-062 to contribute $22,500 — half of a $45,000 annual lease obligation for the Haven of Hope facility — and resolution 2026-063 to appropriate $163,598.96 (50%) of a $327,197.92 operational shortfall for the One Stop hub for FY2027. Both measures passed on roll-call votes.

Monica Barnes, the Haven of Hope founder and executive director, told magistrates the shelter opened Dec. 19 at 301 Steep Street, is 100% volunteer-run and supported by local churches and donations, and has sheltered 182 unique individuals to date. She described shelter hours (evening opening, morning departure), safety checks (warrant checks for guests) and a constraint that the program cannot accept registered sex offenders because of proximity to a nearby kindergarten.

Jill and other officials said the One Stop hub had received state funding for later years but faces an FY27 gap; the City of Richmond requested a 50/50 split. Officials noted the county does not currently have a specific line in the FY27 budget for this expense and that funding would come from reserves if the court moves forward. Supporters emphasized data showing the hub’s referrals reduce costs elsewhere (jail, emergency services) and urged the county to partner to maintain services.

The judge authorized the judge executive (or designee) to execute agreements necessary to implement the funding partnerships.