Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears increased police call volume and plans safety‑committee meeting
Summary
Staff reported a rise in call volume through October and said the split of responses between the city and the sheriff’s office has shifted (city 64% / sheriff 36% through Oct. 24), prompting a planned safety‑committee meeting with the sheriff and other local officials to discuss staffing and response roles.
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council members heard from staff that police call volume has increased through October and that the distribution of responses between the city police and the county sheriff has changed.
A staff member reported that through Oct. 24 the sheriff’s office responded to about 36% of calls for the community while the city handled roughly 64%; last year the sheriff accounted for about 21% and the city 79%, indicating a relative increase in sheriff responses. Staff said many calls are non‑report incidents (personal contacts or ordinance matters) and that some calls do not generate formal reports. The department had two applicants since the last meeting but neither progressed to interview.
Chief Airhard (reported as expected but absent) had asked for a safety‑committee meeting to discuss department staffing; staff said they would arrange a meeting involving the sheriff, local officials, and department representatives and preferably schedule it before an upcoming work session. The council did not take formal action at the meeting but directed staff to coordinate the committee meeting and follow up with findings and possible staffing options.

