Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solar Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developer presents 20 MW solar-plus-storage project to Southampton supervisors; no final approval recorded
Summary
Senergy (Synergy BAP) presented plans for a 20 MW solar project paired with an 8 MW/4-hour battery on roughly 71 acres, describing required Dominion interconnection upgrades and local benefits; board members questioned safety, decommissioning and chain-of-custody concerns, but no final board approval appears in the transcript.
A developer representative presented a 20-megawatt solar array paired with an 8 MW/4-hour battery storage system at the Southampton County Board of Supervisors meeting June 23, outlining site features, safety standards and projected local payments.
The presenter described the project as occupying about 71 acres along General Thomas Highway, with roughly 31,000 solar modules and a small battery storage footprint of about four to six 20-foot containers in the site’s southwest corner. "The project basics is a 20 megawatt project that's paired with an 8 megawatt 4 hour battery storage component," the presenter said.
The developer said the site is not USDA-designated prime farmland, is not visible from public roads, and would be set back from adjacent parcels and the highway. He said Dominion has a signed power-purchase agreement and that the project would pay an estimated $2,750,000 for required interconnection upgrades. The developer also described near-term payments to the county of about $920,000 during construction and an additional $120,000 to volunteer fire and rescue squads, plus long-term benefits he estimated at roughly $914,000 over 20 years.
Supervisors raised questions about proximity of battery containers to solar arrays and fire-safety risk. One supervisor said he was concerned by site-plan scaling and noted the battery-to-solar distance looked close; the developer said there is flexibility and that industry-standard setbacks (including a 50-foot setback between containers and the fence) and NFPA and UL safety standards will be used. A resident questioned chain-of-custody and foreign-influence risks; the developer replied that federal and utility procurement rules and a federal screening process (referred to in the hearing as FIAC/foreign-entity guidance) would limit procurement from companies with foreign influence.
County planning staff said the project checks the county’s land-use boxes for soil class and visibility and reaffirmed that a special-use permit and additional steps would follow before any final approval. The transcript does not record a formal vote on the project; presenters and staff said further steps (including the special-use permit process) remain before final siting decisions.
